<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review Board 1.0 Released!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/</link>
	<description>Virtualization, Open Source, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:41:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: venkat98</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-44563</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-44563</guid>
		<description>Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I’ve been enjoying watching it develop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I’ve been enjoying watching it develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-44170</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-44170</guid>
		<description>Great work on RB!
Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now. And it is developed by some real professional blokes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work on RB!<br />
Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now. And it is developed by some real professional blokes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipX86</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-44143</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipX86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-44143</guid>
		<description>JD: I&#039;d e-mail the mailing list, see if other people are working on this, and then look into our existing reviewboard/scmtools/*.py files to get a feel for how you&#039;d need to implement this. SCM support isn&#039;t *too* complex, though I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s trivial either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD: I&#8217;d e-mail the mailing list, see if other people are working on this, and then look into our existing reviewboard/scmtools/*.py files to get a feel for how you&#8217;d need to implement this. SCM support isn&#8217;t *too* complex, though I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s trivial either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Gupta</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-44090</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-44090</guid>
		<description>You guys are rocking there. I am wondering why does the demo server have more registered users ;-) Summer of code should be exciting, let see if you come out of 1.1 quickly.

I think you guys should just have hooks for SCMs and allow anyone to integrate their SCM. Most SCM can be configured to insist on &#039;reviews&#039; before a commit is made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are rocking there. I am wondering why does the demo server have more registered users ;-) Summer of code should be exciting, let see if you come out of 1.1 quickly.</p>
<p>I think you guys should just have hooks for SCMs and allow anyone to integrate their SCM. Most SCM can be configured to insist on &#8216;reviews&#8217; before a commit is made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-43664</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-43664</guid>
		<description>Chip, it seems that Sourcegear Vault does have a command line interface - http://download.sourcegear.com/misc/vault/help/client/clc.htm

What would be the next step for integrating with it (I&#039;m a Java guy though ...).

Thanks,
JD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chip, it seems that Sourcegear Vault does have a command line interface &#8211; <a href="http://download.sourcegear.com/misc/vault/help/client/clc.htm">http://download.sourcegear.com/misc/vault/help/client/clc.htm</a></p>
<p>What would be the next step for integrating with it (I&#8217;m a Java guy though &#8230;).</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipX86</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-43659</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipX86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-43659</guid>
		<description>JD: Thanks!

People have talked about writing support. For many SCMs (especially Windows-based or for-cost SCMs) we pretty much rely on third parties to provide support. Fortunately this is easy, so long as there&#039;s a command line tool or Python-enabled API for talking to the repository. We&#039;d be glad to work with people on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD: Thanks!</p>
<p>People have talked about writing support. For many SCMs (especially Windows-based or for-cost SCMs) we pretty much rely on third parties to provide support. Fortunately this is easy, so long as there&#8217;s a command line tool or Python-enabled API for talking to the repository. We&#8217;d be glad to work with people on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-43658</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-43658</guid>
		<description>Great work on RB! It&#039;s really great. In my opinion its more user friendly than SmartBear&#039;s CodeCollaborator.

Integration options for other SCM would be awesome. We&#039;re waiting for the Vault/VSS integration. Is there any ETA on that?

Thanks,
JD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work on RB! It&#8217;s really great. In my opinion its more user friendly than SmartBear&#8217;s CodeCollaborator.</p>
<p>Integration options for other SCM would be awesome. We&#8217;re waiting for the Vault/VSS integration. Is there any ETA on that?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev Blog AF83 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Veille technologique : Microsoft, Organisation, Ruby, Rails, PHP, Langages, Sécurité</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-43487</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev Blog AF83 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Veille technologique : Microsoft, Organisation, Ruby, Rails, PHP, Langages, Sécurité</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-43487</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/ : Review Board sort en version 1.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/</a> : Review Board sort en version 1.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-43438</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-43438</guid>
		<description>For the record, I gave a presentation about Review Board at my former workplace, and everyone watching was quite impressed.  This was back in winter of 2008, no less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I gave a presentation about Review Board at my former workplace, and everyone watching was quite impressed.  This was back in winter of 2008, no less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Tredinnick</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-43431</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Tredinnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-43431</guid>
		<description>Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I&#039;ve been enjoying watching it develop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I&#8217;ve been enjoying watching it develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
