Comments on: Botching the Trivial http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/ Virtualization, Open Source, and Life Mon, 10 May 2010 11:14:30 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Michael Fox http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/comment-page-1/#comment-41953 Michael Fox Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:47:50 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=246#comment-41953 I won't tell anyone.. ;) I won’t tell anyone.. ;)

]]> By: ChipX86 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/comment-page-1/#comment-41950 ChipX86 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:56:47 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=246#comment-41950 There are no plans to update Server Console with Tango icons. The icons are largely themeable but in Server Console they're themeable through use of GTK stock IDs, whereas Workstation 6 has moved to standard icon theme icons. I have also wanted to have Tango icons for Server Console. Someone could do it if they wanted to, and I'm sure it'd be welcomed by many. Run vmware-server-console -L to see the icons and their stock IDs if you want to take a stab at it. There are no plans to update Server Console with Tango icons. The icons are largely themeable but in Server Console they’re themeable through use of GTK stock IDs, whereas Workstation 6 has moved to standard icon theme icons.

I have also wanted to have Tango icons for Server Console. Someone could do it if they wanted to, and I’m sure it’d be welcomed by many. Run vmware-server-console -L to see the icons and their stock IDs if you want to take a stab at it.

]]> By: Ken http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/comment-page-1/#comment-41949 Ken Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:10:53 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=246#comment-41949 Any chance we'll see a Tango version of the VMware Server Console icon(s)? Any chance we’ll see a Tango version of the VMware Server Console icon(s)?

]]> By: Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/comment-page-1/#comment-41918 Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:01:04 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=246#comment-41918 Yeah, so, seriously, I think you've still set the bar pretty high. =:) Yeah, so, seriously, I think you’ve still set the bar pretty high. =:)

]]> By: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/comment-page-1/#comment-41916 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:47:56 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=246#comment-41916 Man, don't feel bad. I can assure you that most people would never notice the difference between the icons, I can tell you that. Only people with trained eyes would ever notice that. When you introduced the subject, I thought 'OMG, this should be a pretty nasty bug', but it turns out to be something small, that few people would actually notice. Thanks for all your work with the application icon set! Man, don’t feel bad. I can assure you that most people would never notice the difference between the icons, I can tell you that. Only people with trained eyes would ever notice that. When you introduced the subject, I thought ‘OMG, this should be a pretty nasty bug’, but it turns out to be something small, that few people would actually notice.

Thanks for all your work with the application icon set!

]]> By: anonymous_for_good_reason http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2008/03/28/botching-the-trivial/comment-page-1/#comment-41915 anonymous_for_good_reason Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:06:44 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=246#comment-41915 Don't feel bad. VMware workstation 4.mumble.mumble shipped with MIT-SHM disabled due to a stupid mistake of mine. Was fixed in the next point release, very quietly. Don’t feel bad. VMware workstation 4.mumble.mumble shipped with MIT-SHM disabled due to a stupid mistake of mine. Was fixed in the next point release, very quietly.

]]>