<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I present to you, VMware Server 1.0 beta 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/</link>
	<description>Virtualization, Open Source, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:41:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChipX86</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipX86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 20:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>Mark: All of our products come from the same codebase (more or less). Open sourcing VMware Server means giving away the code to our products to everybody, which would kill us. It&#039;s just not possible.

Now, we do open source what we can. Parts of VMware Tools (the mouse and video drivers for Linux, namely) are open sourced, and exist in the xorg tree. Parts of our UI (the more interesting parts, such as some of our special custom widgets) are open source - see &lt;a href=&quot;http://view.sf.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;libview&lt;/a&gt;.

If you&#039;re a big business with an interest in developing additions to VMware, you can join our Community Source program.

But open sourcing it all? If we do that, there probably wouldn&#039;t be a VMware in another year. Is that really worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: All of our products come from the same codebase (more or less). Open sourcing VMware Server means giving away the code to our products to everybody, which would kill us. It&#8217;s just not possible.</p>
<p>Now, we do open source what we can. Parts of VMware Tools (the mouse and video drivers for Linux, namely) are open sourced, and exist in the xorg tree. Parts of our UI (the more interesting parts, such as some of our special custom widgets) are open source &#8211; see <a href="http://view.sf.net/" rel="nofollow">libview</a>.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a big business with an interest in developing additions to VMware, you can join our Community Source program.</p>
<p>But open sourcing it all? If we do that, there probably wouldn&#8217;t be a VMware in another year. Is that really worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>Why not release VMware Server as open-source (e.g. licensed under GPL or BSD) so that others in the community can help make it into an even better product? And while you&#039;re at it, consider making the vmware-tools software open-source as well. This would allow people to enhance the interface in order to run a wider range of operating systems on your platform. Neither move would likely hurt your bottom line, yet widen the audience of your products, resulting in MORE income from support contracts or purchases of non-free products like ESX or Workstation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not release VMware Server as open-source (e.g. licensed under GPL or BSD) so that others in the community can help make it into an even better product? And while you&#8217;re at it, consider making the vmware-tools software open-source as well. This would allow people to enhance the interface in order to run a wider range of operating systems on your platform. Neither move would likely hurt your bottom line, yet widen the audience of your products, resulting in MORE income from support contracts or purchases of non-free products like ESX or Workstation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h0bbel &#187; Problems downloading VMWare Server?</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>h0bbel &#187; Problems downloading VMWare Server?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>[...] VMWare Server is now available for download on the VMWare site but a lot of peope are having problems downloading it. Chris Hammond, VMWare Developer, has posted a workaround if you have problems with the actual download page. In his post he also explains what VMWare Server is, and perhaps more importantly what it isn&#8217;t. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VMWare Server is now available for download on the VMWare site but a lot of peope are having problems downloading it. Chris Hammond, VMWare Developer, has posted a workaround if you have problems with the actual download page. In his post he also explains what VMWare Server is, and perhaps more importantly what it isn&#8217;t. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somewhere out there! &#187; VMware Server 1.0 beta</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Somewhere out there! &#187; VMware Server 1.0 beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-951</guid>
		<description>[...] From ChipLog, here is&#160;some insight into the just released&#160;VMware Server. The main points of interest being i) its based on GSX and ii) it&#8217;s free. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From ChipLog, here is&nbsp;some insight into the just released&nbsp;VMware Server. The main points of interest being i) its based on GSX and ii) it&rsquo;s free. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought Leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-950</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Outstanding Questions for Sun, Intel, AMD and othe&lt;/strong&gt;

I have been attempting to find the answers to the following questions with little success and figured the blogosphere could point me in the right direction...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Outstanding Questions for Sun, Intel, AMD and othe</strong></p>
<p>I have been attempting to find the answers to the following questions with little success and figured the blogosphere could point me in the right direction&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparrow</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-948</guid>
		<description>I really hope you are right and that my concerns are unwarranted.  You make an excellent point regarding VMWare&#039;s success over the past several years and I have no doubt that the people who manage VMWare are brilliant just like the folks who develop and support their products.

It should be noted that despite all of the success that VMWare has had, not every initiative has been an overwelming success.  For instance, I had huge hopes that VMWare Ace would usher in a new era of client application deployment, and perhaps it still will, but so far it seems that industry reaction has been muted at best.  I guess what has shocked me about this move is that I thought that if VMWare was going to tinker with their business model it would be in the area of VMWare Ace rather than the server side where they seem to have had well recognized success.  I also I would have believed that the margin on GSX would have been substantial enough for it not be considered &quot;throw away&quot; revenue.  Perhaps I am wrong.  

As far as the commoditization of virtualization technology is concerned, I agree that the entire concept is just too powerful and useful for not to become deeply integrated into all forms of microcomputing hardware and software and from multiple vendors.  However, I think we are many years away from any of VMWare&#039;s competitors shipping a viable product that performs anywhere close to VMWare.  And I would like to believe that VMWare will not be standing still as their competitors continue to improve.

Oh well, I will stop my hand-wringing and simply enjoy the benefits of VMWare Server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope you are right and that my concerns are unwarranted.  You make an excellent point regarding VMWare&#8217;s success over the past several years and I have no doubt that the people who manage VMWare are brilliant just like the folks who develop and support their products.</p>
<p>It should be noted that despite all of the success that VMWare has had, not every initiative has been an overwelming success.  For instance, I had huge hopes that VMWare Ace would usher in a new era of client application deployment, and perhaps it still will, but so far it seems that industry reaction has been muted at best.  I guess what has shocked me about this move is that I thought that if VMWare was going to tinker with their business model it would be in the area of VMWare Ace rather than the server side where they seem to have had well recognized success.  I also I would have believed that the margin on GSX would have been substantial enough for it not be considered &#8220;throw away&#8221; revenue.  Perhaps I am wrong.  </p>
<p>As far as the commoditization of virtualization technology is concerned, I agree that the entire concept is just too powerful and useful for not to become deeply integrated into all forms of microcomputing hardware and software and from multiple vendors.  However, I think we are many years away from any of VMWare&#8217;s competitors shipping a viable product that performs anywhere close to VMWare.  And I would like to believe that VMWare will not be standing still as their competitors continue to improve.</p>
<p>Oh well, I will stop my hand-wringing and simply enjoy the benefits of VMWare Server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HPReg</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>HPReg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-944</guid>
		<description>Sparrow: You have a point. But consider what follows.

VMware has been doubling its revenue every year for the last 8 years. It shows that the management of the company is capable and has a good visibility of where the market is going. The market has been moving in the last 8 years, and VMware has adapted to follow the market: Windows on Linux back then, then Disaster Recovery, then Server Consolidation, and now Virtual Data Center.

A few years ago, the management of the company has realized that the hypervisor would eventually be commoditized (we are seeing the beginning of this commodization right now), and they changed the business model of the company to make sure that the revenue stream of the company would not depend on selling the hypervisor anymore, but rather would depend on higher margin products such as VMware ESX Server and Professional Services (classes, support, ...). Now that this business transition is over, the management of the company has decided that it gets more value (advertisement value) by giving its hypervisor for free, rather than selling it for a charge (money value).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sparrow: You have a point. But consider what follows.</p>
<p>VMware has been doubling its revenue every year for the last 8 years. It shows that the management of the company is capable and has a good visibility of where the market is going. The market has been moving in the last 8 years, and VMware has adapted to follow the market: Windows on Linux back then, then Disaster Recovery, then Server Consolidation, and now Virtual Data Center.</p>
<p>A few years ago, the management of the company has realized that the hypervisor would eventually be commoditized (we are seeing the beginning of this commodization right now), and they changed the business model of the company to make sure that the revenue stream of the company would not depend on selling the hypervisor anymore, but rather would depend on higher margin products such as VMware ESX Server and Professional Services (classes, support, &#8230;). Now that this business transition is over, the management of the company has decided that it gets more value (advertisement value) by giving its hypervisor for free, rather than selling it for a charge (money value).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparrow</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-943</guid>
		<description>HPReg: Financial statements reflect that past.  Forward looking disclosures are no guarantee of future performance.  I obviously hope that VMWare continues to do well.  I do wonder how much focus, attention, and mindshare VMServer will get as a non-revenue generating product.  It seems to me that products which generate direct revenue will have to take precendence in terms of development resources when it comes to bug fixes and upgrades; especially if things do not go as well as planned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HPReg: Financial statements reflect that past.  Forward looking disclosures are no guarantee of future performance.  I obviously hope that VMWare continues to do well.  I do wonder how much focus, attention, and mindshare VMServer will get as a non-revenue generating product.  It seems to me that products which generate direct revenue will have to take precendence in terms of development resources when it comes to bug fixes and upgrades; especially if things do not go as well as planned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HPReg</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>HPReg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Richard (Pacifica support): why do you want Pacifica (renamed SVM, a feature that is not out in the chips yet) when you have the VMware Player, Workstation 5.5, and Server all running 64-bit guests on AMD rev E and later today?

Sparrow (VMware financial survival): VMware is now part of EMC, a public company. This means that anybody, including you, can look at VMware&#039;s financial statements to convince yourself that making VMware Server free is not going to kill VMware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard (Pacifica support): why do you want Pacifica (renamed SVM, a feature that is not out in the chips yet) when you have the VMware Player, Workstation 5.5, and Server all running 64-bit guests on AMD rev E and later today?</p>
<p>Sparrow (VMware financial survival): VMware is now part of EMC, a public company. This means that anybody, including you, can look at VMware&#8217;s financial statements to convince yourself that making VMware Server free is not going to kill VMware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/06/i-present-to-you-vmware-server-10-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=153#comment-936</guid>
		<description>What is the &quot;beta&quot; status of this product, if it is just GSX server modified a bit. Should we be hesitant to use this in a live environment until it comes out of beta? What other changes, fixes, etc. are supposed to take place until the final official release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the &#8220;beta&#8221; status of this product, if it is just GSX server modified a bit. Should we be hesitant to use this in a live environment until it comes out of beta? What other changes, fixes, etc. are supposed to take place until the final official release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
