<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spice things up in your relationship with libsexy v0.1.6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/05/spice-things-up-in-your-relationship-with-libsexy-v016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/05/spice-things-up-in-your-relationship-with-libsexy-v016/</link>
	<description>Virtualization, Open Source, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 11:14:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Trowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/05/spice-things-up-in-your-relationship-with-libsexy-v016/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>David Trowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 04:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=152#comment-900</guid>
		<description>As the one responsible for SexyTreeView, I&#039;ll answer this.

I didn&#039;t do it in GTK+, because getting per-cell tooltips into GTK+ requires &quot;doing it right,&quot; which pretty much means a compete overhaul of the tooltip system.  That&#039;s a huge amount of work -- certainly a lot more than I have time for right now.

I don&#039;t feel bad about putting dirty hacks like this into libsexy, because that&#039;s what libsexy is made for.  When GTK+ has it, I&#039;ll deprecate this (and eventually remove it) to get people to move away from it.  Until then, this will let people do what they need to do, even if it&#039;s not the most efficient or correct way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the one responsible for SexyTreeView, I&#8217;ll answer this.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t do it in GTK+, because getting per-cell tooltips into GTK+ requires &#8220;doing it right,&#8221; which pretty much means a compete overhaul of the tooltip system.  That&#8217;s a huge amount of work &#8212; certainly a lot more than I have time for right now.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel bad about putting dirty hacks like this into libsexy, because that&#8217;s what libsexy is made for.  When GTK+ has it, I&#8217;ll deprecate this (and eventually remove it) to get people to move away from it.  Until then, this will let people do what they need to do, even if it&#8217;s not the most efficient or correct way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2006/02/05/spice-things-up-in-your-relationship-with-libsexy-v016/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 04:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=152#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t u just help with getting per-cell tooltips into GTK+ rather than subclassing the GtkTreeView?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t u just help with getting per-cell tooltips into GTK+ rather than subclassing the GtkTreeView?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
